Go to homepage
  • Go to homepage
  • About
    • About the Project
    • Background
    • Team
    • Project CV
    • Acknowledgments
  • Volumes
    • Vol. 1 (1-198)
    • Vol. 2 (199-380)
    • Vol. 3 (381-624)
    • Vol. 4 (625-868)
    • Vol. 5 (869-1112)
    • Vol. 6 (1113-1356)
    • Vol. 7 (1357-1598)
    • Vol. 8 (1599-1840)
    • Vol. 9 (1841-2114)
    • Vol. 10 (2115-2149)
    • Vol. 11 (index)
  • Genres
    • Account / narrative
    • Additional material
    • Contents
    • Conversation
    • Insert
    • Letter
    • Miscellaneous
    • Poem / song / epitaph
    • Speech
    • Title page
  • Networks
    • People
    • Organizations
    • Places
    • Events
  • Search
Vol. 4
Account / narrative
Previous
Some few Remarks by Captain Alexander MacDonald upon Mr Æneas MacDonald's Journal
Next
Account of Colonel Ker's being taken and of his Reprieve

Colonel Ker of Gradyne his Account

Metadata
Titles
Table of Contents
Colonel Ker of Gradyne his Account
Forbes
Colonel Ker of Gradyne his account
Paton
Colonel Ker of Gradyne's Account
Pages
Forbes
Vol. 4, 648—669
Paton
Vol. 1, 355—364
Credits
Encoder (metadata)
Alyssa Bridgman
Transcriber
Jasmyn Bojakli
Transcriber
Leith Davis
Transcriber
Cairen Velasquez
Transcriber
Kaitlyn MacInnis
Proofreader
Jasmyn Bojakli
Proofreader
Leith Davis
Proofreader
Cairen Velasquez
Proofreader
Kaitlyn MacInnis
Encoder
Kaitlyn MacInnis
Status
Document
transcription ready for proof
Metadata
metadata done
Settings
Date
Person Colonel Ker of Gradyne
Place
remediation
in Forbes
Related Documents
Active:
Journal taken from the Mouths of of Laird of MackInnon, Mr Malcolm Mac-Leod, Lady Clanronald and Miss Flora Mac-Donald, by etc. (v01.0125.01): Mentions in footnote
A Conversation with MacDonald of Kingsburgh anent the foresaid Journal, with his Corrections upon it, and some remarkable Sayings of Him and his Lady etc. (v01.0142.01): Mentions in footnote
Journal from the Retreat from Stirling to the Prince's Embarkation for France, being particular and exact, by Mr John Cameron, etc. (v01.0155.01): Mentions in footnote
Captain O Neil's Journal of the Prince's Retreat and Escape after April 16. (v01.0181.01): Mentions in footnote
Malcolm MacLeod's Journal; wherein likewise his own History and several very remarkable Particulars (v02.0228.01): Mentions in footnote
Journal of Donald MacLeod, &c. (v02.0266.01): Mentions in footnote
Wednesday's Afternoon, Septr 9th, 1747 at the Hour appointed (4 o'Clock) Ned Bourk came to my Room, when I went through his Journal with him at great Leisure, and, from his own Mouth, made those Passages plain & intelligible, that were written in confused indistinct Terms. (v02.0326.01): Mentions in footnote
Several particular Cruelties, narrated by Mrs Robertson, alias, Lady Inches, whose Mansion-house is in the Neighbourhood of Inverness and near the Field of Battle (v02.0375.01): Mentions in footnote
Copy of a Letter, said to be written by Lord George Murray, or one of his Friends, 1746 (v03.0429.01): Mentions in footnote
Copy of Orders from the Duke of Cumberland, etc. (v03.0567.01): Mentions in footnote
Colonel Ker of Gradyne his Account (v04.0648.01): Mentions in footnote
Copy of Captain Oneille's Journal taken from a Copy attested by his Name subscribed with his own Hand, with several critical Notes upon the said Journal (v04.0670.01): Mentions in footnote
Macpherson of Strathmashie's Account of Clifton-battle, some Attacks in Athol, and of burning Cluny's House (v05.0890.01): Mentions in footnote
Copy of James Gib's Accompts Master-household to the Prince, being an excellent Journal, interspersed with several curious Notes and Observations (v05.0966.01): Mentions in footnote
Captain Robert Stewart's account of the Skirmish at Keith, distinct & particular (v06.1138.01): Mentions in footnote
Narrative by him of the skirmish at Keith (v06.1138.02): Mentions in footnote
Alexander Stewart's Memorial of his own Sufferings and Hardships, etc. January 30. 1749. (v06.1176.01): Mentions in footnote
Said Stewart's Account of the Design of seizing the Prince at Macintosh's House. (v06.1207.01): Mentions in footnote
Copy of a Letter from the Reverend Mr George Innes, March 15. 1748/9. and of a Narrative, etc. (v06.1254.01): Mentions in footnote
Passive:
Journal from the Retreat from Stirling to the Prince's Embarkation for France, being particular and exact, by Mr John Cameron, etc. (v01.0155.01): Mentioned in footnote
Malcolm MacLeod's Journal; wherein likewise his own History and several very remarkable Particulars (v02.0228.01): Mentioned in footnote
Journal of Donald MacLeod, &c. (v02.0266.01): Mentioned in footnote
Wednesday's Afternoon, Septr 9th, 1747 at the Hour appointed (4 o'Clock) Ned Bourk came to my Room, when I went through his Journal with him at great Leisure, and, from his own Mouth, made those Passages plain & intelligible, that were written in confused indistinct Terms. (v02.0326.01): Mentioned in footnote
Copy of a Letter, said to be written by Lord George Murray, or one of his Friends, 1746 (v03.0429.01): Mentioned in footnote
Colonel Ker of Gradyne his Account (v04.0648.01): Mentioned in footnote
Copy of Captain Oneille's Journal taken from a Copy attested by his Name subscribed with his own Hand, with several critical Notes upon the said Journal (v04.0670.01): Mentioned in footnote
Journal of Captain Donald MacDonald, alias, Donald Roy (v04.0709.01): Mentioned in footnote
Macpherson of Strathmashie's Account of Clifton-battle, some Attacks in Athol, and of burning Cluny's House (v05.0890.01): Mentioned in footnote
Copy of James Gib's Accompts Master-household to the Prince, being an excellent Journal, interspersed with several curious Notes and Observations (v05.0966.01): Mentioned in footnote
Said Stewart's Account of the Design of seizing the Prince at Macintosh's House. (v06.1207.01): Mentioned in footnote
Copy of a Letter from the Reverend Mr George Innes, March 15. 1748/9. and of a Narrative, etc. (v06.1254.01): Mentioned in footnote
Transcription
648 (648)

Copy of Colonel Ker
of Gradyne
his Account.

In order to judge of the State of
the Prince’s Affairs at the Time of
the Battle of Culloden, it will
not be amiss to look back to the
Time of his coming to Inverness,
where the Earl of Loudon com-
manded
before His Highness’s com-
ing
there.
The Earl of Loudon hearing of the
Prince’s coming, &and that He was to
quarter that Night at Moy (the
Seat of the Laird of MacKintosh
about ✝ seven Miles from Inver-
ness
) formed a Design to Xsurprizesurprise
Him, &and to carry Him off, as He
was to have but a ⊕ few Men wtwith
Him for his Guard. The Earl
marched from Inverness with most
of the Garrison, and was within a-
bout
ⓧ two Miles of Moy, where ac-
cidentally
⊝ five of the Prince’s
People, going about their own pri-vate

✝
Vol: 2. pag: 380. —
X⊕ⓧ ⊝
Colonel
Ker
’s Account of this Affair agrees most ex-
actly
with that of CapnCaptain Malcolm MacLeod;
but the Account given by the Captain is
much more exact &and circumstantial, as may
be seen in Vol: 2. pag: 258, 259, 260. Vol: 5. p: 989, &cetc
Vol: 6. pag: 1256, 1207.
Robert Forbes, A:M:
649(649)
vate Affairs, met with Loudon’s ad-
vanced
Guard, &and being under
Night called to them; but yethe five,
finding who they were, called
out loudly for Lochiel &and yethe other
Clans to advance. Lord Lou-
don’s
People
, not doubting but
they were there, took Flight,
&and returned to Inverness in great
Confusion, &and left it ✝next Day
on the Prince’s appearing on the
rising Ground above the Town,
retiring with his Men to the Shire
of Ross
, where they continued, till
theX Earl of Cromarty with a Party
was sent in pursuit of them. U-
pon
his Approach, they retired
towards Tain, where we shall
leave them for a While, &and re-
turn
to Inverness.
The Prince, coming before the
Place, summoned the Castle
to surrender, and, on being re-
fused
, a Battery was raised; but
the CanonCannon being but small had
little Effect upon it, which obliged the

✝
Vol: 2. pag: 261, 273.
Vol: 5. pag: 993. V: 6. p: 1258.
X
Vol: 1. p 156
650 (650)
the Besiegers to have Recourse to a
Sap, which being brought near the
Angle of one of the Bastions, the
Castle was surrendredsurrendered &and the Gar-
rison
made Prisoners. This being
done, Brigadier Stapleton, with
Lochiel’s &and Keppoch’s Regiments,
Lord John Drummond’s (which
was not compleatcomplete, a great many
of them being made Prisoners in
their Passage to Scotland) &and the
French Piquets, were sent to
besiege✝ Fort-Augustus, which sur-
rendred
surrendered
likewise, &and the Garrison
were made Prisoners. After qchwhich
it was thought proper to leave
Part of L[] Lord John Drummond’s
Regiment
there, &and to send Lo-
chiel’s
&and Keppoch’s Regiments, the
French Piquets &and some of Lord
John Drummond’s Regiment
(in
all not 300 Men) with Brigadier
Stapleton
to invest Fort-william;
where we shall leave them, and
Return to the Earl of Cromarty in
Pursuit of the Earl of Loudon to-
wards
Tain, where the said Earl
cross’dcrossed the Ferry with his Men, &and went over

✝
Vol: 1. pag: 156.
651 (651)
over to ^the Shire of Sutherland; where we shall
again leave him for a While &and re-
turn
to Inverness, from which the
most of the Prince’s Troops, that
were not employed as above,
were sent to Spey-side, under the
Command of Lord John Drummond,
to guard that River against any
✝SurprizeSurprise from the Duke of Cum-
berland
, who by that Time was
come with his Troops to Aberdeen,
&and had sent some of Kingston’s
Horse
&and some of the Argyleshire-
men
to XKeith (a small Village
about six Miles from the River
Spey
) where they were all sur-
prized
surprised
&and made Prisoners.
As it had been assured, that yethe Duke
of Cumberland
was to stay at A-
berdeen
(where he had thrown up
some Works to prevent a SurprizeSurprise)
till all the Forces he expected
should join him, the Prince on his
Part took his Measures, and, in or-
der
to secure a Retreat, in Case he
had no Mind to fight till he should
get all his Men together, or to march
into Perthshire, if needful, for yethe better Support

✝
Vol: 1. pag: 156.
X
Vol: 6. pag: 1138, 1139, &cetc.
652 (652)
Support of his Army, was advised to
endeavour the Recovery of Blair-castle
(which he would not allow to be
burntburned when he passed that Way)
which was then possessed by Sir
Andrew Agnew
with some regular
Troops under his Command, as were
most of the principal Posts in A-
thol
by the Campbells, whilst the
6000 Hessians &and StSaint George’s Dra-
goons
lay at Crief &and Places ad-
jacent
. Lord George Murray was
ordered to march with the Athol-
men
to Badenoch to join the Mac-
Phersons
, that lay about Ruth-
ven
of Badenoch (from yethe Time
the Prince had passed that Way)
to guard the Passes leading to &and
from Athol, &and to get Intelligence
on that Side.
As soon as Lord George had join’djoined
the MacPhersons, they marched wtwith
such Expedition into Athol, that
they surprizedsurprised a great many of the
Campbells at✝ Blairfetty,X Keinochin,
&and other☂ Posts possessed by them, &and
made most of them⊕ Prisoners; but
SrSir ⓧ Andrew Agnew, being alarmed by

✝X☂⊕
See Volume 3d, Pag: 567, 568. Vol: 5. 902.

ⓧ
Who pillaged yethe House of Lude (yethe Widow Lady living
in it) breaking to pieces all yethe Doors &and Windows, &and yethe Finish-
ing
of yethe Rooms, &and some of the Floors.
Robert Forbes, A:M:
653 (653)
by his Out-Sentinels, retired into
the Castle, in which he was shut
up for seventeen Days; some Part
Of which Time it was battered
with✝ two Pieces of CanonCannon, one of
three the other of four Pounds,
which made but little Impression
upon the Walls, though they ruin-
ed
the Roof.
During this Time the Hessians march-
ed
to relieve the Castle, &and some of
the Athol-men being advanced as
far down as Dunkeld to get Intel-
ligence
, &and to guard that with oyrother
Passes on the River, where were
frequent Skirmishes between the
&and the Hessian-Hussars &and some of
St George’s Dragoons, who had come
to reconnoitre, some Days before
the Foot came up; but when they
were come up, the Athol-Men were
obliged to retire (as they could
not be supported at such a Dis-
tance
) to Pitlochrie, near the fa-
mous
Pass of Killicrankie, where,
with some others that were sent
from Blair, they continued about
eight Days (the MacPhersons with some

[✝]
Vol: 5. p: 907.
654 (654)
some of the Athol-Men keeping SrSir
Andrew
&and his Men still shut up in
the Castle) always skirmishing wtwith
the Hussars &and Dragoons, till their Foot
came up, which obliged the Athol-
Men
to retire into the above Pass,
where they continued that Day; but,
as they were few in Number, Lord
George
called a Council of the
Officers, who were of Opinion, ytthat
the Pass was not tenable, since
it might be surrounded on all
Sides by such a vastly superioursuperior
Number. It was therefore resolv-
ed
to abandon both it &and yethe Castle,
which was accordingly done that
Night; and, having send the CanonCannon
away, they marched to Ruthven of
Badenoch without the least Inter-
ruption
from the Enemy. Here
the ✝ MacPhersons were left as former-
ly
, &and the Athol-Men were ordered to
the Spey-side. Lord George went on
to Inverness, and, upon his Arrival
there, Intelligence being brought that
Lord Loudon had repass’drepassed with his
Troops
from Sutherland To Tain, he
was ordered to march with some
Troops to join the Earl of Cromarty, &and

✝
Vol: 5. p: 907. Vol: 6. pag: 1267.
655 (655)
&and to give Lord Loudon Battle, if he
would stay for it: But he, hearing of
Lord George’s March, returned to Suther-
land
again. ✝Lord George, having giv-
en
the necessary Orders to Lord Cro-
marty
(who continued to command in
that Country) returned to Inverness;
where it was resolved,Xthe Duke of
Perth
should be sent to take upon
Him the Command, and, if possi-
ble
, to get as many Boats together,
as would ferry over his Men, and
to drive Lord Loudon out of Suther-
land
, if he would not stay to fight.
The Boats were got together, and
the Duke of Perth with his Men
passed over without being perceiv-
ed
, &and surprizedsurprised ☂ Lord Loudon’s Peo-
ple
, obliged them to capitulate,
&and made them Prisoners. Lord Lou-
don
&and the President of the Session
of Scotland
made their Escape; af-
ter
which the Duke of Perth seized
some Ships, that lay in the Firth of
Tain
, on Board of which were all
the valuable Effects, that were shiptshipped
on Board at Inverness before Lord
Loudon
left it, the military Chest
excepted, which had been conveyed on

✝ X
These Particulars represent the Earl of
Cromarty
in a very indifferent Light. Vol: 6. p: 1259.

☂
It should be some of Lord Loudon’s.
Robert Forbes, A:M:
656 (656)
on Board a Frigate, which lay in
the Bay. This done, the Duke of
Perth
returned to Inverness, leav-
ing
the Command to the Earl of
Cromarty
.
About this Time the Hazard-Sloop,
returning from France with Mo-
ney
, Arms, &and Ammunition, &and several
French &and SpainishSpanish Officers on Board,
was✝ chased on Shore, by an English
Man of War
, in Lord Rae’s Country,
where they landed their Cargo,
and, apprehending no Danger fmfrom
the Country People, they provided
themselves with a Guide to con-
duct
them &and their Cargo to the Earl
of Cromarty
; but, as they were on
their March, they were set upon by
Lord Rae’s People, who, after a good
Resistance, made them Prisoners, &and
carried off the Cargo, which was
thought could not have been done
without the Treachery of the Guide,
who disappeared before the Action
began. This News being brought to
Inverness, Orders were sent to the
Earl of Cromarty to send a Party in-
to
Lord Rae’s Country to demand Sa-
tisfaction
; but his Lordship being some-what

✝
Vol: 6. pag: 1261.
657(657)
what dilatory in executing his Or-
ders
, Lord Rae’s People gathered to-
gether
with some of Lord Loudon’s
Officers at their Head.
About this Time Advice was brought
to Inverness, that the Duke of Cum-
berland
(being joined by all the
Forces he expected) had begun his
March from Aberdeen Northwards,
&and had ordered the Ships, that at-
tended
^him with Provisions for his Army,
to coast along in Sight of him
to Inverness: Upon which, Orders
were dispatched to the✝ Earl of Cro-
marty
to call in his Detachments,
&and to march with all Expedition
to join the Prince. He gave his Or-
ders
accordingly, &and went himself wtwith
some of his Officers to Dun-Robin-
Castle
to bid Adieu to the Countess
of Sutherland
, &and to thank her for
the Civilities they had received from
her. Whilst they were there amus-
ing
themselves, the Castle was
surrounded by Lord Sutherland’s &and
Lord Rae’s People, who, having had
Intelligence of their being there,
made them all Prisoners. Orders were

✝
Vol: 1. pag: 156. Vol: 6. pag: 1261.
658 (658)
were likewise sent at this Time to
the MacPhersons, &and to those that were
at Fort-Augustus &and Fort-William,
to join the Prince as soon as pos-
sible
. Those from Fort-Augustus
&and the French Piquets joined on
Saturday, &and Lochiel from Fort-Wil-
liam
on ✝ Sunday. Advice was
brought on Monday, that yethe Duke
of Cumberland
was coming to
the Spey, &and that Lord John Drum-
mond
, with the Troops under his
Command, was retiring: Upon qchwhich,
the Prince ordered the Drums to
beat &and the Pipes to play To Arms.
The Men in the Town assembled
as fast as they could, the CanonCannon
was ordered to march, &and yethe Prince
mounted on Horseback, &and went out
at their Head to Culloden-house,
the Place of Rendezvous, &and Lord
George Murray
was left in yethe Town
to bring up those, that were quar-
tered
in the Neighbourhood of In-
verness
, which made it pretty late
before he joined the Prince at Cullo-
den
. Orders were likewise sent to
Lord John Drummond to assemble there

✝
On Monday says Mr John Cameron,
see Vol: 1. pag: 157.
659 (659)
there likewise, which he did yethe next
Day being Tuesday.
Tuesday,✝ being April 15th, the whole
Army
marched up to the XMuir about
a Mile to the Eastward of Culloden-
House
, where they were all drawn
up in Order of Battle to wait the
Duke of Cumberland’s coming.
Keppoch’s Men joined in the Field
from Fort-William, &and the Whole
was reviewed by the Prince, who
was very well pleased to see
them in such good Spirits, tho’though
they had eaten Nothing that Day
but one single ⊗ BisketBiscuit a Man; Pro-
visions
being very scarce &and Money too.
The Prince (being informed ytthat
the Duke of Cumberland had halted
that Day at Nairn to refresh his
Men
, &and that the Ships with ^his Provisions
were coming into the Bay of Inver-
ness
that Evening) called a Council
of War; and, after☂ great Debates (altho’

✝
The Copy, fmfrom qchwhich I transcribed, had here ysethese Words,
viz, “Wednesday being yethe 16th of April,” which
certainly behoved to be an Error; as it is well
known, that the Battle of Culloden was
fought upon Wednesday, April 16th.

X
Vol: 1. p: 126, 127, 157, 181. Vol: 3. p: 430.
ⓧ
Vol:
1. p: 157. Vol: 3. p: 432.
☂
Vol: 1. p: 126. Vol: 3.
p: 430, 431, 432.
Robert Forbes. A:M:
660 (660)
(altho’although neither the Earl✝ of Cromarty,
who by that Time was Prisoner tho’though
not known, nor theX MacPhersons, nor
a great many of the☂ Frazers were
come up) it was resolved to march,
&and endeavour to surprizesurprise the Duke in
his Camp at Nairn, about ⓧtwelve Miles
distant. Accordingly the March was
begun between seven &andΠ eight o’Clock
at Night, the first Column command-
ed
by Lord George Murray, the Se-
cond
by the Prince. The Night being
dark occasioned severalρ Halts to be
made for bringing up the Rear.
When about Half-way Lord George
ordered Colonel Ker, one of yethe Prin-
ce’s
AidAide de Camps, to go from Front
to Rear, &and give Orders to the respec-
tive
Officers to order their Men to
make the Attackσ Sword in Hand, qchwhich
was thought better, as it would not
alarm the Enemy soon, &and that their
Fire-arms would be of Use to ymthem
afterwards. When he returned to the

✝X☂
Vol: 3. pag: 430, 431.
ⓧ
Vol: 1. pag: 157.

Π
Vol: 1. pag: 127, 157. / Vol: 3. pag: 437.

ρ
Vol: 3. pag: 438, 439. —
σ
Mr John Came-
ron
says Sword and Pistol, See Vol:
1. pag: 157. but certainly Colonel Ker,
who carried the Orders from Lord George
Murray
, must know that Point best.
Robert Forbes, A:M:
661 (661)
the Front, to acquaint Lord George
Murray
of his having execute his
Orders, he found, they were halted
a little to the Eastward of ✝Kilra-
vock
-House
, deliberating whether
or not they should proceed (hav-
ing
then ^but four XMiles to march to
Nairn, where the Enemy was en-
camped
) or return to Culloden.
As they had not an Hour of most
or thereabouts to Day-Light, &and if
they could not be there before that
Time, the SurprizeSurprise would be ren-
dered
impracticable, &and the more
so, as it was not to be doubted,
that the Enemy would be under
Arms before Day-light, as they were
to march that Morning to give yethe
Prince Battle. The Duke of Perth
&and his Brother, Lord John, who had
been sent to advise the Prince, re-
turned
to Lord George. ☂Lochiel &and
others, that were in the Front, hear-
ing
that there was a great Interval
between the two Lines, which would
take up most of the Time to Day-light
to join, it was resolved to return to Cul-
loden
, which was accordingly done; qchwhich
some say, was contrary to the Prince’s Incli-nations.

✝X
Vol: 3. p: 438, 439.
☂
Vol: 3. p: 441. Vol: 1. p: 158.
Vol: 6. p: 1270.
662(662)
nations. They marched the shortest
Way back by the Church of Croy,1
which though but scarce two Miles
from the Place where the Halt was
made, yet it was✝ clear Day-light
before the Front arrived there;
which makes it clear, there was
noX possibility of surprizingsurprising yethe Enemy
before Day-light as was design’ddesigned.
The March was continued to
Culloden, from whence a great
many, both Officers &and Soldiers, went
to Inverness &and other Places in Quest
of Provisions, which were very much
wanted. The Prince, with great
Difficulty having got some Bread
&and WhiskieWhisky at Culloden, where
reposing himself a little after
having marched all that Night
on Foot, had Intelligence brought,
that the Enemy was in Sight;
where uponwhereupon those about Culloden
were ordered to Arms, &and several
Officers sent to Inverness &and Places
adjacent to bring up what Men
they could meet with.
Whilst those about Culloden were
marching up to the Muir above the
House, where they were☂ join’djoined by a-bout

✝
Vol: 3. pag: 442. —
X
Vol: 3. pag: 441.
Vol: 1. pag: 157, 158. —
☂
Vol: 3. pag: 445.
663(663)
bout three hundred of the Frazers
just then come up, Colonel Ker went
out to reconnoitre the Enemy. When
he returned, he told the Prince &and
Lord George, that their Foot were
marching in three Columns with
their Cavalry on their Left, so that
they could form their Line of Bat-
tle
in an Instant. The Prince or-
dered
his Men to be drawn up
in two Lines, &and the few Horse he
had in the Rear towards the Wings,
&and the CanonCannon to be disperstdispersed in the
Front, which were brought up wtwith
great Difficulty for Want of Horses.
As there was not Time to march
to the Ground they were on the Day
before, they were drawn up a✝ Mile
farther Westward, with a Stone-in-
closure
enclosure
on the Right of the first Line,
&and the Second at a proper Distance
behind, after having reconnoitred
the InclosureEnclosure, which ran down to
the Water of φNairn on the Right,
so that no Body of Men could pass without

✝
Vol: 1. pag: 157. Vol: 3. p. 443.

φ
In the Copy, which I made my Transcript from,
the Word here was Ern, which behoved to be a Mis-
take
; the Water of Ern being in Perthshire.
The same Mistake was in the said Copy a se-
cond
Time, viz, in the 4th Line of pag: 667 []
in this Vol:
Robert Forbes, A:M:
664 (664)
without throwing down the Walls.
And, to guard farther against any
Attempts, that might be made on
that Side, there were two✝ Battali-
ons
placed facing outwards, qchwhich
covered the Right of the two Lines,
&and to observe the Motion of the E-
nemy
, if they should make any
Attempt that Way.
The Duke of Cumberland formed
his Line at a great Distance, &and
marched in Battle-order, till he
came within CanonCannon-shot, where
he halted, &and placed his CanonCannon
in different Places, at some Dis-
tance
, in his Front, which out-
winged the Prince’s both to the
Right &and Left without his Caval-
ry
, which were mostly on yethe Left,
some few excepted, that were
sent to cover the Right. As soon as
the Duke’s CanonCannon were placed, he
began CanonadingCannonading, which was an-
swered
by the Prince’s, who rode
along the Lines to encourage his
Men, &and posted himself in the most
convenient Place (here one of his
Servants
2 was killed by his Side) to see
what pass’dpassed, not doubting but the Duke would
✝
Vol: 1. pag: 160. Vol: 3. pag: 445.
665 (665)
would begin the Attack, as he had both
the Wind &and Weather on his Back,
Snow &and Hail falling very thick at the
same Time.
Here it is to be observed, that nei-
ther
those, that had been with the Earl
of Cromarty
, (He with his Son &and some
of his Officers being only made Pri-
soners
, his Men having marched on
before), nor the MacPhersons, nor
between two &and three thousand Men,
that had been on the Field the
Day before, were come up. Notwith-
standing
all these Disadvantages,
&and the Duke’s CanonCannon playing ✝wtwith great
Execution, Lord George Murray, who
commanded the Right, Xsent Colonel
Ker
to the Prince to know if He
should begin the Attack, which the
Prince accordingly ordered. As yethe
Right was farther advanced than
the Left, Colonel Ker went to the
Left, &and ordered the Duke of Perth,
who commanded there, to begin the
Attack, &and rode along the Line till he

✝
Vol: 3. pag: 445. Vol: 1. p: 129.

X
As this proceeds from Colonel Ker himself,
who behoved to know this Matter best, so it is
more ^to be depended upon than other Accounts, qchwhich
differ from this, &and some of which tell it in such
a Way, as to leave an Insinuation of some Blame
[u]pon LdLord Geo:George Murray, whose Bravery can never
[b]e called in Question. Vol: 1. p: 160, 129.
Robert Forbes, A: M:
666 (666)
he came to the Right, where Lord
George
was, who attacked, at yethe Head
of the Athol-Men (who had yethe Right
of the Army that Day) with all the
Bravery imaginable, as did indeed
the whole Line, breaking yethe Duke’s
Line in several Places, &and making
themselves Masters of two Pieces of
the Enemy’s CanonCannon. Though they
were both ✝ frontedX &and flanked by
them, they notwithstanding march’dmarched
up, under a close Firing from Right
to Left, to the very Points of their
Bayonets, which they could not see
for the SmoakSmoke till they were upon ymthem.
At the Beginning of yethe Attack,
the Campbells ☂ threw down a great
deal of the Wall of the InclosureEnclosure,
for the Dragoons on the Duke’s Left
to pass to the Rear of the Prince’s
Army
, which they were suffered to do
without ⓧreceiving one Shot from the
two Battalions, that were placed to
observe their Motions. This being ob-
served
, &and the constant Fire kept up
by the Duke’s Foot in the Front, put the
Prince’s People in Disorder, &and rendered the
✝X
Vol: 1. p: 129, 161, 182. Vol: 3. p: 446.

☂ⓧ
This says very ill for the Corps posted to
guard the Park-walls, in order to prevent the
Prince’s Army being flanked by the Enemy from
that Quarter. Vol: 1. pag: 160.
Robert Forbes, A: M:
667 (667)
the Defeat of his Army compleatcomplete.
The Prince ✝ retired in good Or-
der
, with some few of his Men, and
crossed the Water of Nairn at the
Ford on the High-way between In-
verness
&and Corry-Burgh
, without be-
ing
pursued by the Enemy, where
he parted with them, taking only
a Few of Fitz-James’s Horse &and some
Gentlemen along with Him up
that River; the Rest taking the
High-way to Ruthven of Bade-
noch
, where they stayed some
Days, expecting an Answer to a
Letter that was sent to yethe Prince;
but it not coming in the Time ex-
pected
, they all separated, ever-
ry
one
everyone
to do the best he could for
himself. Most of the Clans had gone
from the Field of Battle towards their
respective Countries.
The PublickPublic has been no ways fa-
vourable
to XLord George Murray;
but if they had been Witnesses of
his Zeal &and Activity from the Time
he joined in that Affair to the last
of it, his exposing his Person where-
ever
an Occasion offered, &and in parti-cular

✝
Vol: 1. p: 130, 161, 183. Vol: 2 p: 328.
Vol: [] 4. p: 675. —
X
Here Colonel Ker vin-
dicates
Lord George Murray from Villainy; an Im-
[p]utation
, which no Man, in his right Senses, could
ever
668(668)
cular at the Battle of Culloden,
where he went on with the First &and
came not off till the last, they
would not have done him more Justice.
And whatever Sentiments they
have been pleased to say the
Prince had of Him, they are hard-
ly
to be credited, &and for this Rea-
son
; because when, after the Bat-
tle
, Colonel Ker went to acquaint
the Prince how Affairs were going,
His Highness enquired partciularly
about Lord George Murray, &and being
told he had been thrown from his
Horse in the Time of the Action,
but was no Way hurt, yethe Prince,
in Presence of all that were there,
desired Colonel Ker to find him out

ever entertain agtagainst Lord George, because
no Villain would have exposed his Person so
remarkably ^as he did, where Danger call’dcalled upon all
Occasions. Besides, if Lord Geo:George had acted the
double &and dishonest Part, why should he have
skulked, &and at last have gone to foreign Parts?
But then, it is worth noticing, that Colonel Ker
says not a Word with Respect to the Insolence
&and Haughtiness of Lord George’s Temper, his
great Misfortune &and Fault, in qchwhich alone he can
be justly blamed, &and wtwith qchwhich he stands charged by
the Prince’s own Words to more than one, Vol: 1.
p: 150. Vol: 2. p: 236. — See likewise Vol: 3. p: 450,
451, 452, 453. However, to do Lord Geo:George Justice, it is affirm-
ed
by some, qowho have an Opportunity of knowing, that Lord
Geo:George
before he left Scotland, did declare his SurprizeSurprise to
a Friend (Murray of Abercairney) how it could enter
into
669 (669)
out, and take particular Care of him;
which, it is to be presumed, he would
not have done, if he had had the
least Suspicion of what has been
laid to his Charge by his Enemies.

[]

[i]nto the Head of any Person to charge ^him wtwith [] treache-
[r]y
; but at the same time that he acknowlegedacknowledged wtwith
[C]oncern &and Regret, that he had been too often guil-
[ty]
of contradicting &and thwarting the Prince in the Mea-
[s]ures
he proposed.—Certainly, tho’though both be bad enough, yrethere is
a great difference ‘twixtbetwixt Villany &and pride.
Robert Forbes, A: M:
Downloads
Download XML Download manuscript images as PDF
Citation
Forbes, Robert. “Colonel Ker of Gradyne his account.” The Lyon in Mourning, vol. 4, Adv.MS.32.6.19, fol. 14v–25r. The Lyon in Mourning Project, edited by Leith Davis, https://lyoninmourning.dhil.lib.sfu.ca/v04.0648.01.html.
Appendix
The location of this church is unknown, but it may have been on or near the site of the church built in 1764.
Kaitlyn MacInnis
Probably meaning Thomas Ca.
Kaitlyn MacInnis

Version: 1.0.0b. Last built: September 26, 2025 @ 10:56am (revision a7293ed).